Saudi Arabia has accelerated the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced technologies as part of its broader economic and institutional transformation. This reflects a national strategy to modernise the public sector; strengthen regulatory capacity; and support the development of a diversified, knowledge-based economy, while ensuring that technological adoption is embedded via clear legal and governance structures.
A key milestone in this process was the establishment of the Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA) in 2019, which serves as the central authority responsible for national data governance and AI policy. Through SDAIA’s mandate, Saudi Arabia has positioned data and AI as strategic national assets subject to defined principles, institutional oversight and coordinated implementation.
This institutional framework has been reinforced by binding legislation, most notably the Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL), which governs the collection, processing, storage and transfer of personal data. The PDPL establishes core compliance obligations, including lawful processing, purpose limitation and data minimisation, while introducing controls on cross-border data transfers. Together with national data management standards and AI governance principles, the framework emphasises transparency, security and human oversight, making clear that responsibility for outcomes remains with the relevant institution or professional.
As clients across industries digitise their operations, legal services are also expected to become more responsive, data-aware and commercially aligned. This evolving expectation places pressure on law firms to modernise their internal operations while maintaining legal rigour. Legal teams are now judged not only by the accuracy of their advice but also by the speed and format in which that advice is delivered.
Within this regulatory context, AI is increasingly used in legal practice for support rather than a substitute for professional judgment. AI-enabled tools are being adopted to assist with research, document review and drafting, offering efficiency gains when deployed appropriately. However, the use of such tools also raises important ethical and compliance considerations. Legal practitioners remain responsible for confidentiality, independence and regulatory compliance, regardless of the technology employed. While certain legal-focused AI platforms assert secure environments and limitations on data use, these assurances do not displace professional obligations or regulatory accountability.
For law firms, the adoption of AI is not merely a technology upgrade but an operational shift. Introducing AI tools impacts workflow design, internal review processes and quality control mechanisms. Firms must assess how these tools fit within established professional structures, ensuring that innovation enhances, rather than disrupts, legal accountability.
The growing presence of AI will also shape the training and development of future lawyers. Beyond training, technological fluency is becoming a differentiator in attracting and retaining top legal talent. Younger lawyers expect to work in modern environments but must also be guided to uphold analytical depth and ethical standards. Balancing innovation with tradition will be key to long-term institutional resilience. When integrated responsibly, these technologies can support learning and skill development, but they must complement not replace foundational legal reasoning and judgment. In response, law firms are increasingly expected to adopt internal policies governing AI use, supervision and data handling. By embedding AI adoption within structured internal controls, firms can realise the benefits of technological advancement while safeguarding professional standards and client trust.
Saudi Arabia’s measured, governance-first approach to AI sets an example for other jurisdictions navigating similar transformations. Rather than allowing unregulated innovation to take hold, the Kingdom has prioritised legal and institutional clarity – a model that balances innovation with professional and public trust.
Read More from OBG
